Franklin Pierce
W-L: (23-14) PR = 94.1659Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 926 A Union AC (12-22, 94.6) 0- 3 927 A Union AC (12-22, 94.6) 0- 2 1010 A Sacred Heart WHA (14-27, 93.4) 4- 2 1011 A Sacred Heart WHA (14-27, 93.4) 2- 6 1016 A Post WHA (11-28, 92.3) 2- 0 1017 A Post WHA (11-28, 92.3) 2- 3 1024 A Vermont (16-20, 94.8) 0- 3 1025 A Vermont (16-20, 94.8) 3- 1 1031 H Assumption WHA (19-18, 93.9) 2- 3 1031 H Post WHA (11-28, 92.3) 0- 5 1101 A Assumption WHA (19-18, 93.9) 2- 1 1107 A LIU WHA (18-19, 93.1) 0- 2 1108 A LIU WHA (18-19, 93.1) 3- 0 1114 A Stonehill WHA (18-20, 93.7) 5- 4 1115 H Stonehill WHA (18-20, 93.7) 4- 2 1121 H Post WHA (11-28, 92.3) 2- 0 1122 H Assumption WHA (19-18, 93.9) 7- 0 1203 H Saint Anselm WHA (19-21, 93.9) 2- 1 1204 A Saint Anselm WHA (19-21, 93.9) 3- 3 109 H Sacred Heart WHA (14-27, 93.4) 3- 2 110 H Sacred Heart WHA (14-27, 93.4) 3- 1 116 H Post WHA (11-28, 92.3) 2- 0 116 H Saint Anselm WHA (19-21, 93.9) 0- 5 117 H Post WHA (11-28, 92.3) 4- 2 123 H Assumption WHA (19-18, 93.9) 0- 2 124 A Assumption WHA (19-18, 93.9) 3- 3 130 H LIU WHA (18-19, 93.1) 1- 2 131 H LIU WHA (18-19, 93.1) 3- 4 206 H Stonehill WHA (18-20, 93.7) 2- 1 207 A Stonehill WHA (18-20, 93.7) 5- 2 213 A Boston University (11-23, 94.4) 6- 0 214 A Providence (12-25, 94.0) 5- 1 220 H Saint Anselm WHA (19-21, 93.9) 4- 2 221 A Saint Anselm WHA (19-21, 93.9) 2- 6 221 A Stonehill WHA (18-20, 93.7) 1- 4 227 H Post WHA (11-28, 92.3) 8- 0 228 H Vermont (16-20, 94.8) 5- 1 304 H Stonehill WHA (18-20, 93.7) 2- 1 307 H Saint Anselm WHA (19-21, 93.9) 2- 0
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
926 A Union 0- 3 -3 -1 - -2.22
927 A Union 0- 2 -2 -1 -1.22
1010 A Sacred Heart 4- 2 2 0 1.60
1011 A Sacred Heart 2- 6 -4 0 -- -4.40
1016 A Post 2- 0 2 1 0.55
1017 A Post 2- 3 -1 1 - -2.45
1024 A Vermont 0- 3 -3 -1 - -2.03
1025 A Vermont 3- 1 2 -1 + 2.97
1031 H Assumption 2- 3 -1 1 -1.65
1031 H Post 0- 5 -5 2 --- -7.22
1101 A Assumption 2- 1 1 0 1.12
1107 A LIU 0- 2 -2 1 - -2.69
1108 A LIU 3- 0 3 1 + 2.31
1114 A Stonehill 5- 4 1 0 0.93
1115 H Stonehill 4- 2 2 1 1.15
1121 H Post 2- 0 2 2 -0.22
1122 H Assumption 7- 0 7 1 +++ 6.35
1203 H Saint Anselm 2- 1 1 1 0.31
1204 A Saint Anselm 3- 3 0 0 0.08
109 H Sacred Heart 3- 2 1 1 -0.17
110 H Sacred Heart 3- 1 2 1 0.83
116 H Post 2- 0 2 2 -0.22
116 H Saint Anselm 0- 5 -5 1 -- -5.69
117 H Post 4- 2 2 2 -0.22
123 H Assumption 0- 2 -2 1 - -2.65
124 A Assumption 3- 3 0 0 0.12
130 H LIU 1- 2 -1 1 - -2.46
131 H LIU 3- 4 -1 1 - -2.46
206 H Stonehill 2- 1 1 1 0.15
207 A Stonehill 5- 2 3 0 + 2.93
213 A Boston University 6- 0 6 -1 +++ 6.59
214 A Providence 5- 1 4 0 ++ 4.21
220 H Saint Anselm 4- 2 2 1 1.31
221 A Saint Anselm 2- 6 -4 0 - -3.92
221 A Stonehill 1- 4 -3 0 - -3.07
227 H Post 8- 0 8 2 ++ 5.78
228 H Vermont 5- 1 4 0 ++ 4.20
304 H Stonehill 2- 1 1 1 0.15
307 H Saint Anselm 2- 0 2 1 1.31
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 1031 H Post 0- 5 -5 2 --- -7.22 1011 A Sacred Heart 2- 6 -4 0 -- -4.40 116 H Saint Anselm 0- 5 -5 1 -- -5.69 926 A Union 0- 3 -3 -1 - -2.22 1017 A Post 2- 3 -1 1 - -2.45 1024 A Vermont 0- 3 -3 -1 - -2.03 1107 A LIU 0- 2 -2 1 - -2.69 123 H Assumption 0- 2 -2 1 - -2.65 130 H LIU 1- 2 -1 1 - -2.46 131 H LIU 3- 4 -1 1 - -2.46 221 A Saint Anselm 2- 6 -4 0 - -3.92 221 A Stonehill 1- 4 -3 0 - -3.07 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 1122 H Assumption 7- 0 7 1 +++ 6.35 213 A Boston University 6- 0 6 -1 +++ 6.59 214 A Providence 5- 1 4 0 ++ 4.21 227 H Post 8- 0 8 2 ++ 5.78 228 H Vermont 5- 1 4 0 ++ 4.20 1025 A Vermont 3- 1 2 -1 + 2.97 1108 A LIU 3- 0 3 1 + 2.31 207 A Stonehill 5- 2 3 0 + 2.93 |
Franklin Pierce Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Delaware | Franklin Pierce | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 2) | Franklin Pierce | |
| Lindenwood | Lindenwood | Lindenwood | ||
| Mercyhurst | Mercyhurst | Mercyhurst | ||
| Penn State | Penn State | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 0) | Penn State | |
| RIT | RIT | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 0) | RIT | |
| Robert Morris | Robert Morris | tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 0) | Robert Morris | |
| Syracuse | Syracuse | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Syracuse | |
| Brown | Brown | Brown 2- 1 vs 0- 1 | ||
| Clarkson | Clarkson | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) | Clarkson | |
| Colgate | Colgate | Colgate 2- 0 vs 0- 1 | ||
| Cornell | Cornell | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 2) | Cornell | |
| Dartmouth | Franklin Pierce | insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 2- 1) | Franklin Pierce | |
| Harvard | Harvard | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 1) | Harvard | |
| Princeton | Princeton | Princeton 3- 0 vs 1- 1 | ||
| Quinnipiac | Quinnipiac | Quinnipiac 2- 0 vs 0- 1 | ||
| RPI | Franklin Pierce | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 1) | Franklin Pierce | |
| St. Lawrence | St. Lawrence | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 0) | St. Lawrence | |
| Union | Union | Union | ||
| Yale | Yale | tied - ( 3- 2) ( 3- 0) | Yale | |
| Boston College | Franklin Pierce | Franklin Pierce 6- 3 vs 3- 3 | ||
| Boston University | Franklin Pierce | Franklin Pierce | ||
| Connecticut | Connecticut | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 0) | Connecticut | |
| Holy Cross | Holy Cross | insuffient: ( 4- 3)( 3- 1) | Holy Cross | |
| Maine | Maine | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 2) | Maine | |
| Merrimack | Franklin Pierce | insuffient: ( 2- 3)( 1- 3) | Franklin Pierce | |
| New Hampshire | New Hampshire | insuffient: ( 3- 4)( 4- 1) | New Hampshire | |
| Northeastern | Northeastern | Northeastern 3- 0 vs 1- 1 | ||
| Providence | Franklin Pierce | Franklin Pierce | ||
| Vermont | Franklin Pierce | Franklin Pierce | ||
| Assumption | Franklin Pierce | Franklin Pierce 7- 3 vs 2- 3 | ||
| LIU | LIU | LIU | ||
| Post | Franklin Pierce | Franklin Pierce | ||
| Sacred Heart | Franklin Pierce | Franklin Pierce | ||
| Saint Anselm | Franklin Pierce | Franklin Pierce | ||
| St.Michael's | St.Michael's | St.Michael's | ||
| Stonehill | Franklin Pierce | Franklin Pierce | ||
| Bemidji State | Bemidji State | Bemidji State | ||
| Minnesota | Minnesota | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 0) | Minnesota | |
| Minnesota Duluth | Minnesota Duluth | Minnesota Duluth | ||
| Minnesota State | Minnesota State | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 0) | Minnesota State | |
| Ohio State | Ohio State | Ohio State | ||
| St. Cloud State | St. Cloud State | St. Cloud State | ||
| St. Thomas | St. Thomas | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 1) | St. Thomas | |
| Wisconsin | Wisconsin | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 0) | Wisconsin |
PowerWise = 13
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 36.18
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Union (12-22, 94.6) 0- 3 -5.34 2.60 0.39 0.93 -2.30
0 A Union (12-22, 94.6) 0- 2 -5.34 2.60 0.39 0.93 -2.30
0 A Sacred Heart (14-27, 93.4) 4- 2 -6.52 1.41 0.39 0.93 3.34
0 A Sacred Heart (14-27, 93.4) 2- 6 -6.52 1.41 0.39 0.93 -2.84
0 A Post (11-28, 92.3) 2- 0 -7.57 1.00 0.39 0.93 2.57
0 A Post (11-28, 92.3) 2- 3 -7.57 1.00 0.39 0.93 -3.33
0 A Vermont (16-20, 94.8) 0- 3 -5.15 2.78 0.39 0.93 -2.21
0 A Vermont (16-20, 94.8) 3- 1 -5.15 2.78 0.39 0.93 5.88
0 H Assumption (19-18, 93.9) 2- 3 -6.00 1.94 -0.39 0.93 -2.96
0 H Post (11-28, 92.3) 0- 5 -7.57 1.00 -0.39 0.93 -3.69
0 A Assumption (19-18, 93.9) 2- 1 -6.00 1.94 0.39 0.93 4.31
0 A LIU (18-19, 93.1) 0- 2 -6.81 1.12 0.39 0.93 -2.98
0 A LIU (18-19, 93.1) 3- 0 -6.81 1.12 0.39 0.93 2.80
0 A Stonehill (18-20, 93.7) 5- 4 -6.19 1.74 0.39 0.93 3.94
0 H Stonehill (18-20, 93.7) 4- 2 -6.19 1.74 -0.39 0.93 2.51
0 H Post (11-28, 92.3) 2- 0 -7.57 1.00 -0.39 0.93 1.14
0 H Assumption (19-18, 93.9) 7- 0 -6.00 1.94 -0.39 0.93 2.88
0 H Saint Anselm (19-21, 93.9) 2- 1 -6.04 1.89 -0.39 0.93 2.79
0 A Saint Anselm (19-21, 93.9) 3- 3 -6.04 1.89 0.39 0.93 203.43
0 H Sacred Heart (14-27, 93.4) 3- 2 -6.52 1.41 -0.39 0.93 1.91
0 H Sacred Heart (14-27, 93.4) 3- 1 -6.52 1.41 -0.39 0.93 1.91
0 H Post (11-28, 92.3) 2- 0 -7.57 1.00 -0.39 0.93 1.14
0 H Saint Anselm (19-21, 93.9) 0- 5 -6.04 1.89 -0.39 0.93 -2.98
0 H Post (11-28, 92.3) 4- 2 -7.57 1.00 -0.39 0.93 1.14
0 H Assumption (19-18, 93.9) 0- 2 -6.00 1.94 -0.39 0.93 -2.96
0 A Assumption (19-18, 93.9) 3- 3 -6.00 1.94 0.39 0.93 203.43
0 H LIU (18-19, 93.1) 1- 2 -6.81 1.12 -0.39 0.93 -3.34
0 H LIU (18-19, 93.1) 3- 4 -6.81 1.12 -0.39 0.93 -3.34
0 H Stonehill (18-20, 93.7) 2- 1 -6.19 1.74 -0.39 0.93 2.51
0 A Stonehill (18-20, 93.7) 5- 2 -6.19 1.74 0.39 0.93 3.94
0 A Boston Univers (11-23, 94.4) 6- 0 -5.53 2.40 0.39 0.93 5.17
0 A Providence (12-25, 94.0) 5- 1 -5.91 2.02 0.39 0.93 4.46
0 H Saint Anselm (19-21, 93.9) 4- 2 -6.04 1.89 -0.39 0.93 2.79
0 A Saint Anselm (19-21, 93.9) 2- 6 -6.04 1.89 0.39 0.93 -2.62
0 A Stonehill (18-20, 93.7) 1- 4 -6.19 1.74 0.39 0.93 -2.69
0 H Post (11-28, 92.3) 8- 0 -7.57 1.00 -0.39 0.93 1.14
0 H Vermont (16-20, 94.8) 5- 1 -5.15 2.78 -0.39 0.93 4.45
0 H Stonehill (18-20, 93.7) 2- 1 -6.19 1.74 -0.39 0.93 2.51
0 H Saint Anselm (19-21, 93.9) 2- 0 -6.04 1.89 -0.39 0.93 2.79
------
434.35
|
winning pts = 68.0184 losing points = -40.5383
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------